This is what debate looks like in the Age of Twitter

It’s not rational, but don't blame social media.

Jon Miltimore | June 24, 2016

It’s not rational, but don't blame social media.
This is what debate looks like in the Age of Twitter

Last year, my colleague Daniel Lattier wrote an article that touched on the breakdown of rational debate in our culture.

He noted that, frustratingly, the most important issues of our time are often the most difficult to discuss rationally.

The reason for this is that people are often approaching topics with very different premises. The result, as philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre points out in his famous work After Virtue, are irrational debates that never end. (Or, rather, they end only with people ridiculing “the emotions or attitudes of those who disagree with one.”)

If you’re looking for evidence of this phenomenon, look no further than the exchange that took place yesterday on Twitter between Piers Morgan, Dana Loesch, and Steven Crowder.

And Loesch moves in for the kill ... 

I this share not (only) to make fun of these individuals. Each of them, in my opinion, are probably bright people. But this exchange is a perfect example of why and how rational debate is so impossible today.

Crowder clearly believes people have a fundamental right to own a gun, and that such a right cannot be stripped without due process. This sounds crazy to Piers Morgan. (People are dying!)

Why the disagreement? Because the two men are operating from premises that are entirely different.

Crowder appears to subscribe to a philosophy of natural rights. It's the idea that the Founding Fathers did not bestow to the people a Bill of Rights; rather, these rights belonged to the people as they were “endowed by their Creator.”

This view is likely to be absurd to a man who views the Bible and the Constitution as inherently flawed documents. Taking away a right doesn't seem extraordinary if said rights derive from a bare majority of men and women elected by other men and women. 

Different premises. Different concepts of authority. 

The result? Exactly what MacIntyre says:

“There seems to be no rational way of securing moral agreement in our culture.”

H/T Twitchy

--

Jon Miltimore is the senior editor of Intellectual Takeout. Follow him on Facebook.

[Image Credit: Pete Riches-Flickr | CC BY 2.0]



Republish

Republish this content

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except for material where copyright is reserved by a party other than Intellectual Takeout.
Please do not edit the piece, ensure that you attribute the author and mention that this article was originally published on IntellectualTakeout.org

Please copy the above code and embed it onto your website to republish.
Close