Campaign Finance Reform
"I'm John Doe and I approve this message." During election season, various forms of this statement are repeated so often that many of us begin to mumble them in our sleep. Although this redundant phrase seems silly and useless, it provides a concise picture of the many rules and issues that are involved in the American election process, one of which is campaign finance reform.
Campaign finance reform has been a topic especially prevalent in the political world for the last 40 years. Based on the proposition that elections and candidates have become corrupt and manipulated by those who fund them, campaign finance reform seeks to establish a variety of "dos and don'ts" on how elections should be run. According to many researchers, the public believes that this idea is ethical and praiseworthy. However, due to the many hidden legal implications of campaign finance reform, obtaining this moral high ground is not as easy as it might seem.
As with many other divisive political topics, there are two major opinions on the issue of campaign finance reform. Proponents believe that campaign finance reform will result in less corrupt and less expensive elections. By implementing limits on campaign donations and mandating a variety of proper procedures, supporters of campaign finance reform hope to make it easier for the average citizen to run for office while also eliminating negative campaign attack ads. A key proposition is public financing, using taxpayer dollars to fund individual campaigns.
On the other hand, opponents believe that campaign finance reform may actually enable more corrupt campaign practices and make it more difficult for the average citizen to compete against a public office incumbent. They also worry that tighter regulations of campaign finance limit free speech.
Campaign finance practices received an overhaul in 2002 with the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, popularly known as McCain-Feingold. In recent weeks, the issues involved with this legislation have come to the forefront once again with the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This library section will provide you with a variety of opinions and analysis concerning the implications of campaign finance reform.
Engage
Click thumbnails below to view links
Online
Offline
On Campus
More About This Topic...
Related Content
- Federal Election Commission - Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
- Federal Election Commission - Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
- John McCain's War on Political Speech
- John McCain's War on Political Speech
- Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold in Response to the Supreme Court's Decision in Citizens United v. FEC
- Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold in Response to the Supreme Court's Decision in Citizens United v. FEC
- New Library Topic: Campaign Finance Reform
- New Library Topic: Campaign Finance Reform
- So Far, So Good on Campaign Finance Reform
- So Far, So Good on Campaign Finance Reform

