Checks and Balances in Government

The modern understanding of checks and balances is that of government divided into separate and distinct branches. Each branch is endowed with certain safeguards to prevent against concentration and abuse of power. The concept of checks and balances has been widely implemented in a variety of constitutional governments, including the United States, where powers are distributed between three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.

Examples of checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution include: the president can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override that veto with a 2/3 vote; the president commands the army but Congress  declares war and appropriates funds; the president appoints justices to the Supreme Court, but only with the approval of the Senate; Congress and the president can pass laws, but the Supreme Court can strike those laws down as unconstitutional.

In designing the U.S. Constitution, the Framers sought to secure individual liberty against the encroachment of governmental power. The system of checks and balances they devised draws inspiration not only from the French political philosopher Montesquieu (who is most commonly associated with this topic), but also from the ancients.

The experience of ancient governments had demonstrated to thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle and Polybius, among others, that society is composed of three forces: the one, the few, and the many. Governmental power thus could correspondingly be vested in rule by one (monarchy), rule by the few (aristocracy), and the many (democracy). Pure forms of either were generally apt to degenerate (e.g. Athens), while a mixed constitution (e.g. Rome) could incorporate and balance against each other all three of those forces. Indeed, checks and balances is an elaboration of this early version of a separation of powers theory.

Critics argue that checks and balances tend to slow the process of governing thereby preventing urgently needed action from taking place. However, that is the intended effect. To guard against tyranny, human nature must be obliged. After all, "what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."

Show More

Engage

Click thumbnails below to view links

Online

Become a fan of Intellectual Takeout on Facebook!
Share Intellectual Takeout with friends, family, and colleagues on Facebook and Twitter!
At Intellectual Takeout, we think it's about time freedom went viral. Before our generation is the opportunity to embrace freedom, to unleash each individual's potential, and to have a prosperous future. And yet it seems that almost everyone running our cities, states, and federal government is intent on destroying freedom and burying us in debt to pay for it. If you, like us, believe that...

Offline

Know your rights with Flex Your Rights guide to the "10 Rules for Dealing with Police."
How often do you hear conservatives being called a bunch of knuckle-dragging Neanderthals? Here's the reality: Conservatism, classical liberalism, and libertarianism have a rich, intellectual heritage reaching back many millennia. Our ideas are not just some historical relics from bygone eras; they are the very foundation of Western Civilization in general, amd the United States in particular....
Looking for an internship? If so, Intellectual Takeout has an opportunity for you. We have plenty of work to do as well as ideas to spread, and we need your help to get it done. If you're interested in an internship with Intellectual Takeout, you likely share our passion and you're excited about the possibility of working for a great cause. That said, you might have a few questions about what "...
Let's face it, most of us love to watch TV and movies. A wonderful way to spread ideas is to embrace our love of the cinema by hosting a movie night with friends and family.  There are numerous documentaries that do a fantastic job of sharing the ideas of liberty. You can pull a small group of friends together at your house or even consider asking a local restaurant or tavern to let you...
In a highly regulated society such as ours, it's very easy to get yourself in trouble with the law. Learn more about how to protect yourself with the 5th Amendment and how to interact with the police.
The Association of American Educators (AAE) advances the teaching profession through personal growth, professional development, teacher advocacy and protection, as well as promoting excellence in education so that our members receive the respect, recognition and reward they deserve.

On Campus

We've built Intellectual Takeout to provide you with quick, easy access to information. In time, we hope to become your one-stop-shop for the ideas of freedom. If your professor allows you to bring your laptop to class (if not, you can use an iPhone), we recommend keeping a tab open to Intellectual Takeout. As we continue to generate new content on the site, you will be able to fact check the...
In the land of the free and the home of the brave, speech codes are a particularly odious example of politically correct repression on many a college campus. In some ways, college campuses are the least free places for thinking and speech in America. Your best friend for fighting your school's repressive speech codes is the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). Here's a short clip...
When it comes to campus life injustices, student fees rank high on any list. On most campuses across the country a mandatory student fee is assessed to each student at the beginning of the year. A portion of this fee, which may be several hundred dollars, will go toward funding various political, religious, and interest groups.  A college requiring you to support groups espousing ideas which...

More About This Topic...

Click thumbnails below to view links

Quote Page

Commentary or Blog Post

"Aristotle's solution was for politeia – a mixed constitution – and the modern equivalent of this is called demarchy. In a demarchic constitution (a) government ministers are appointed on merit alone and held to account by (b) a randomly-selected parliament, counselled by (c) a diverse and balanced chamber of independent advocates. This tripartite distinction (...

Spalding traces the roots of American progressives to German thinkers who believed in the "Administrative State." Here, government is controlled by administrators and "experts," rather than officials elected to represent the people. Spalding also notes that the Founders and the progressives differed in their view of the Constitution. Progressives believed in a "...

Explaining the constitutional set-up of the House of Representatives and the Senate, Morrisey discusses differences between the Constitution and the previous Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation had outlined a federal government in which all three powers—legislative, executive, and judicial—resided entirely in one Congress. This was...

Faust argues that a buildup of more power in the Federal Open Market Committee's ability to set interest rates ignores the logic of Checks and Balances.

This school lesson plan includes a section on separation of powers but goes on to ask students, "How is the Constitution a living document?"

There are a variety of reasons the United States is still classified as limited: We don't live under totalitarianism, Congress and the states do pay their citizens a level of deference, and government officials are still sworn to uphold the Constitution. Even so, the U.S. government far exceeds not only the limited government structure libertarians prefer but also...

"James Madison didn't originate the idea of checks and balances for limiting government power, but he helped push it farther than anyone else before or since. Previous political thinkers, citing British experience, had talked about checks and balances with a monarch in the mix, but Madison helped apply the principle to a republic. Contrary to such respected...

"POLITICO's Kasie Hunt, who's in the House chamber, reports that Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words 'not true' when President Barack Obama criticized the Supreme Court's campaign finance decision."

Lim reminds us that the American founders enacted a system of checks and balances, purposefully rendering change in government a difficult task. Although modern presidents have consistently proposed forms of administrative change under their leadership, slow government progress should not frustrate us. This is the deliberate, careful system our Constitution...

Contemporary controversies such as the individual mandate involved in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) demand an appreciation for the United States Constitution. The document was not, contrary to belief, a celebration of unrestrained democracy but, rather, a safeguard for individual rights.

"The most conservative principle of the Founding Fathers was distrust of unchecked power. Centuries of experience substantiated that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men are not angels. Ambition must be made to counteract ambition to avert abuses or tyranny. The Constitution embraced a separation of powers to keep the legislative, executive, and judicial...

Chart or Graph

Some people describe Checks and Balances as a cursory "sharing of powers." While it is certainly true that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches share the duties of government, this only describes half of the concept. Indeed, as this diagram illustrates, the arms of government all serve as watchmen of the other branches. For instance, the Supreme Court...

This chart compares the Roman Republic's system of checks and balances to that of the United States.

Analysis Report White Paper

"Divided government has been the rule in Washington for most of the last fifty years. This is increasingly true in state governments, too. What do people think about it? There is little evidence from national polls that most Americans think critically about the issues of partisan or institutional balance. When the Pew Research Center, for example, gives...

De Jasay draws upon the Enlightenment philosophies of Hobbes and Montesquieu to explain his belief that checks and balances rely on more than just rational choice theory.

The federal judicial appointment process typifies the procedures, struggles and negotiations between the branches of government. The American public tends to focus on the President's role in choosing judicial nominees and on the Senate's role in approving or vetoing them after nomination, but this is just the most public aspect of the power-sharing in our system of...

In the Anglo-American constitutional tradition, judicial checks and balances are often seen as crucial guarantees of freedom. Hayek distinguishes two ways in which the judiciary provides such checks and balances: judicial independence and constitutional review. The authors discuss these differences and create a new database of constitutional rules in 71 countries...

Underscoring the tremendous historical accomplishment of limited government, the handbook identifies the roots of free society as far back as the higher laws of the ancient Hebrews and Greeks. Reiterating the supremacy of law over man, the handbook urges modern legislators to avoid delegating power to bureaucracies, on the grounds that these procedures sidestep the...

Montesquieu is famously heralded for directly inspiring the framers of the United States Constitution. Zuckert re-examines Montesquieu's actual philosophy, highlighting the manner in which the founders internalized Montesquieu's thoughts in consistent and divergent ways that eventually translated into America's core framework.

"The paper investigates the effects of checks and balances on corruption. Within a presidential system, effective separation of powers is achieved under divided government, with the executive and legislative branches being controlled by different political parties. When government is unified, no effective separation exists even within a presidential system, but, we...

"The separation of powers, the concept that the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government ought to be separate and distinct, is a central feature of the United States Constitution. Through this separation, each branch works according to its own authority, forming a check or balance against any abuse of power by the remaining two branches. James...

Appearing during the Reagan Administration in 1983, Olson's article discusses the Supreme Court's rejection of the legislative veto device--a decision Olson believes reinforced a proper understanding of checks and balances and halted what Olson identifies as an erosion of executive power. Olson goes on to re-examine the accountability of government in light of...

Ethridge highlights the Progressive attempt to evade checks and balances by delegating power to bureaucratic agencies. Indeed, the efficiently responsive government Progressives prefer has not translated into social equality. In contrast, the U.S. Constitution, as intended by the framers, fosters heated debate by design. This way, when policy does formulate, it...

The United States Constitution was a dramatic revision of the earlier Articles of Confederation in that it established the powers of a national and federal government. What underlies this shift and what can the Federalist Papers tell us about the Federalists' motivations?

Meese relays why the Constitution of the United States, coupled with the philosophies of the Declaration of Independence, outlined the principles of America's unique and liberating government.

Video/Podcast/Media

"I'm here to talk this afternoon about what I think is a very important issue about the constitutional law and … what it means to be an American, which is whether it's proper and efficient to limit the power of our government by lifting certain rights that we have against the government."

Democracy can serve as an incredibly liberating system, but it can also wield grave dangers if it capitulates to the rule of the mob. How does the American Constitution guarantee freedom while guarding against anarchy?

"The system through which Congress, the Presidency, and the Supreme Court regulate one another is examined, and the specific regulatory powers of each branch is detailed."

"Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts addressed students at the University of Alabama Law School about the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. Following his remarks he responded to questions from audience members. In response to a student, Justice Roberts said the Senate's confirmation process for federal judges is 'broken down' and stated that President Obama's...

"Daniel Lazare, Author of the Book: The Frozen Republic: How The Constitution Is Paralyzing Democracy.

James Madison's celebrated checks and balances have left the American government without direction or even final authority. In an effort to find the source of our nation's problems, political scientist Lazare offers a passionate...

"Students from the University of Denver and Pace University in New York City participated by broadband feed in a distance learning class. Bruce Fein spoke to the classes about the Constitution and responded to questions from students. This course was a partnership between C-SPAN, The Cable Center and the University of Denver."

"POLITICO's Kasie Hunt, who's in the House chamber, reports that Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words 'not true' when President Barack Obama criticized the Supreme Court's campaign finance decision."

"Down on the boardwalk, we interview a few young Americans to find out what they know about the Constitution of the United States. Can you answer the questions? Does it matter?"

"We ask moms on the street what they know about the Constitution. Can you answer the questions? Does it matter?"

"What does it take to achieve limited, republican government in a large nation such as the United States?  Is it possible to sustain a healthy republic over a large territory?  As events unfold, this has become a pressing question.  The Founders had to deal with this question as well, and they turned to Montesquieu for guidance.  The most...

When the Founders forged our Constitution in the summer of 1787, they held deep convictions for what the American republic ought to look like. What were these convictions? What did they mean then and what should they mean now? Mr. Meese guides us through the core principles of America's history.

"The panelists talked about the concepts of checks and balances and balance of power. The federal government is designed in a manner that prevents one branch from overpowering the other two branches. The panelists talked about the breakdown of these checks in the modern system. They also talked about the role of the mainstream media in political discourse. After...

Primary Document

Blackstone's work is considered the most authoritative statement of the pre-American Revolution common law. It influenced the American founding documents, and continues to be a persuasive legal authority in the United States and other common law jurisdictions.
James Kent was an American legal scholar. Widely popular, his Commentaries consist of a series of lectures on the history of law, the American Constitution, federal and municipal law, and laws concerning persons and property.

"The object of these essays is not to exhaust criticism of the government of the United States, but only to point out the most characteristic practical features of the federal system. Taking Congress as the central and predominant power of the system, their object is to illustrate everything Congressional. Everybody has seen, and critics without number have said,...

When the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was created, a Polish leader asked two political thinkers to draft suggestions on a new constitution for Poland. This volume provides Rousseau's suggestions. He does not suggest massive reforms to align the government with his ideals expressed in The Social Contract, warning that too dramatic of change could lose as much as it was intended to gain.

"The American constitutional system includes a notion known as the Separation of Powers. In this system, several branches of government are created and power is shared between them. At the same time, the powers of one branch can be challenged by another branch. This is what the system of checks and balances is all about.

There...

"Arguably no political principle has been more central than the separation of powers to the evolution of constitutional governance in Western democracies. In the definitive work on the subject, M. J. C. Vile traces the history of the doctrine from its rise during the English Civil War, through its development in the eighteenth century - when it was indispensable to...

"Taylor defends a strict 'states rights' interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and advocates limited republican government."

Niccolò Machiavelli's defense of republican principles. He argues for governments of the people because they are better than those of princes. His arguments have had great influence across the centuries and deeply influenced the American Founders.

"THIS book is a plea for the sacredness of the Constitution of the United States. I do not mean by this that I consider our Constitution, framed a hundred and twenty years ago, well suited to the needs of our existing government. Its rigid provisions, its system of checks and balances, are an obstacle to popular government, and they should be radically changed by...

"TO WHAT expedient, then, shall we finally resort, for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the several departments, as laid down in the Constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate, the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government...

"A FIRM Union will be of the utmost moment to the peace and liberty of the States, as a barrier against domestic faction and insurrection. It is impossible to read the history of the petty republics of Greece and Italy without feeling sensations of horror and disgust at the distractions with which they were continually agitated, and at the rapid succession of revolutions by which they were...

"Responding to criticism about his proposal to restructure the Supreme Court, Roosevelt criticizes conservative judges who blocked important New Deal programs and advocates a restructuring of the judiciary. Ultimately, the President's plan deteriorates, but, nonetheless, Roosevelt was eventually able to reshape the court by appointing eight justices before his...

"Had the praise of History been passed over by former Chroniclers it would perhaps have been incumbent upon me to urge the choice and special study of records of this sort, as the readiest means men can have of correcting their knowledge of the past. But my predecessors have not been sparing in this respect. They have all begun and ended, so to speak, by enlarging...

Plutarch recounts the life of Sparta's legendary founder Lycurgu,s and the evolution of Spartan political and social institutions: "There is so much uncertainty in the accounts which historians have left us of Lycurgus, the lawgiver of Sparta, that scarcely anything is asserted by one of them which is not called into question or contradicted by the rest. Their...

The reflections of statesman Dr. James Henry, which have proven an excellent resource for historians seeking a first-hand account of the Federal Convention.

"Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength. And tonight, tonight I'd like to talk about how together we can deliver on that promise."

In this work, Bolingbroke advances the idea of separation of powers, particularly the necessity of achieving a balance between the king, parliament and the people.

Saint Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica. Although unfinished, it provided a foundation for many religious and secular institutions and proved very influential throughout the Middle Ages.
After the Pennsylvania Convention ratified the new constitution on December 12, 1787, by a vote of 46 to 23, twenty-one members of the minority signed a dissenting address that appeared in the Pennsylvania Packet and Daily Advertiser....

"Probably written by a pupil of Aristotle, it is the first history of Athens as a model democracy, how it came into existence, and how it operated in practice."

Madison's Federalist #10 argues for a large and powerful republic to combat the problem of factions. He argues that factions were the cause of the downfall of the ancient democracies and small republics. The American Constitution, with this in mind, advocates a republican form of government that would solve the problem of factions and prevent internal strife while maintaining liberty.

"One of the principal objections inculcated by the more respectable adversaries to the Constitution, is its supposed violation of the political maxim, that the legislative, executive, and judiciary departments ought to be separate and distinct. In the structure of the federal government, no regard, it is said, seems to have been paid to this essential precaution in favor of liberty. The...

The Laws, Plato's last and longest dialogue, is written as a conversation between three old men from different Greek cities.
Aristotle, one of the best known Western philosophers, concluded his work on ethics with the statement that he intended to look into "the whole question of the management of a state." The Politics was his effort to do so. He examines the origin and purpose of government, and then discusses Plato's The Republic and other proposed and existing forms of government.
This volume, written in dialogue format, is the original work of political idealism by one of the best-known Western philosophers.

"The great fundamental issue now before the Republican party and before our people can be stated briefly. It is: Are the American people fit to govern themselves, to rule themselves, to control themselves? I believe they are. My opponents do not. I believe in the right of the people to rule. I believe the majority of the plain people of the United States will, day...

"The purpose of this study is to trace the rise ami development of the bicameral system from its beginnings in Massachusetts to its incorporation into the Federal Constitution. The acknowledged importance and universal application of this principle of government would seem to warrant a study of the various steps and, in so far as may be, of the causes which led to...

Locke's Second Treatise develops his descriptions of the state of nature along with natural law. His work was extremely influential in the founding of America and its Constitution.

"Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they. How did this change come about? I do not know. What can make it legitimate? That question I think I can answer. If I took into account only force, and the effects derived from it, I should say: 'As long as a people is compelled to...

Montesquieu was a significant advocate of separation of powers between executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and his discussion of law contributed significantly to the concept of rule of law.
The Constitution of the United States established the federal governmental system currently in place with three branches of government. The premise of executive privilege developed from the separation of powers clause.
John Adams' suggestions for the formation of a new government in the North Carolina provincial congress.

"Most political writers have concluded, that a republican government, over a very large territory, cannot exist; and as this opinion is sustained by alarming proofs, and weighty authorities, it is entitled to much respect, and serious consideration. All extensive territories in past times, and all in the present age, except those of the United States, have been, or...

The Virginia Declaration of Rights, drafted in 1776, heralds the inherent rights of man--rights the protection of which provides citizens the motivation to rebel against an unjust government.

Preparing to leave office, Washington wrote his now famous "Farewell Address" to placate American concerns that a country without his leadership could not survive. Washington stresses the importance of unity, the supremacy of the Constitution, the danger of political parties, and a resistance to foreign entanglements. Above all, Washington exemplifies a humble presidency and the attitude that...

Books

Link

Related Content