Home » Topics » Air » Kyoto Protocol
» Byrd-Hagel Resolution
Print This!Print This!

Byrd-Hagel Resolution

Byrd-Hagel Resolution
Senator Robert Byrd
Senator Chuck Hagel
1st Session
105th Congress
1998

This Senate resolution, sponsored by 60 senators in 1998, and approved in a 95-0 vote, expressed the sense of the Senate that the Kyoto Protocol posed a threat to US economic viability, and to other "Annex - 1" countries including the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, and other countries included in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), while excluding the 129 "developing" nations of the world, including China, India, Mexico, and South Korea, whose greenhouse gas emissions will exceed those of the United States and OECD countries in the (now very near) future.

This resolution and its subsequent vote effectively stopped the Kyoto Protocol in its tracks as far as US ratification was concerned.

Library Topic
Library Topic: Kyoto Protocol

More About This Topic...

Click thumbnails below to view links

Quote Page

Quotes on the Kyoto Protocol from the leading experts, scientists, and politicians regarding the failures and successes of the agreements.

Commentary or Blog Post

For developing countries, it may prove a rather attractive package with its shiny paper of guaranteed economic growth and its ribbons of exciting new technology, perhaps more enticing than the European offering of mandatory targets and sanctions.
Developing countries, such as China and India, were not required to reduce emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. In preparation for the 2009 Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, the EU is now pressuring those growing economies to reduce their emissions.
The Kyoto Protocol is burdening Europe's industries and consumers with soaring costs that are undermining Europe's international competitiveness without improving environmental conditions.
The global environmental movement calls it a historic victory, but critics in the industry and elsewhere say the bang could end in a whimper: Emissions of carbon dioxide will continue to rise, many of the cuts in greenhouse gases claimed under Kyoto probably would have happened anyway.
It is clear that during the 2000 Global Warming treaty meeting in the Hangue that the EU's unstated but overriding goal in passing the Kyoto Protocol was to make the US pay for being the richest country in the world.
Motivation behind Russia's acceptance of the Kyoto Protocol and how Russia actually stands to benefit from Kyoto since its emissions levels are already below its 1990 emissions levels and can therefore sell its pollution quota credits to other countries.
The science is by no means settled. We are not in a position to confidently attribute past climate change to carbon dioxide or to forecast what the climate will be in the future.
Aynsley Kellow describes the four parts of what he calls "the Kyoto Process" (which he sees as a negotiating instrument for eco-groups to achieve their political goals), why the process failed, his concerns about the politicization of science, and what it means for future international instruments.
The authors explain why the Kyoto Protocol has failed to reduce emissions and describes a relatively new approach put forth by the Bush Administration that focuses on the need for technological innovation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The new agreement reached between the U.S. and five major Asian-Pacific nations to respond to global warming in a way that will not compromise the economic growth of both developing and industrial nations, and why the Kyoto Protocol failed.

Chart or Graph

Many models the Kyoto Protocol depends upon for justification project continuing rises in carbon dioxide levels. If those models are wrong, then the need for the Kyoto Protocol and similar agreements in the future is questionable.
129 developing nations are exempt from any restrictions under the Kyoto Protocol.

Analysis Report White Paper

Explains why the current emission scenarios are almost certainly too high and ought to be revised as quickly as possible.
An essay discussing the proposed benefits of the Kyoto Protocol, and concluding that it would not improve American health.
The report, published by the Chamber of Commerce of Saskatchewan, gives a brief explanation of the Kyoto Protocol, touches upon the science of global warming, and then mainly details the economic impacts of Kyoto on Saskatchewan, Canada, and the world.
Climate change is mainly projected to add to existing problems, rather than create new ones. Of particular significance are four categories of hazards to human health and safety which have frequently been cited as major reasons for controlling greenhouse gas emissions.
Yale economists William Nordhaus and Joseph Boyer examine the economic impacts of Kyoto and conclude it will be highly cost-ineffective. They find the net global cost of the Kyoto Protocol is $716 billion; the United States bears almost two-thirds of the global cost; and the cost-benefit ratio of the Kyoto Protocol is 7 to 1.
A wide range of economic models predict that reducing U.S. carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to either 1990 levels or to the Kyoto target (7 percent below 1990 emission levels) would reduce U.S. GDP and slow wage growth significantly, worsen the distribution of income, and reduce growth in living standards.
This is a collection of essays that answers questions like, "Who is paying for Kyoto?"; "Will Kyoto make the world safer?"; and "How do we know whether humans are influencing climate change?"

Video/Podcast/Media

The science underlying the Kyoto Protocol is seriously flawed and that the Canadian government should delay implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.
A short overview of the Kyoto Protocol debate, as given by an intellectual from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia.
Dr. Michael MacCracken is Chief Scientist for Climate Change Programs with the Climate Institute, a group that supported Kyoto and believes that climate change is a crisis and requires immediate action.

Primary Document

The resolution expressed the sense of the Senate that the Kyoto Protocol posed a threat to US economic viability, and to other "Annex - 1" countries including the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries.
Negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) were completed December 11, 1997, committing the industrialized nations to specified, legally binding reductions in emissions of six “greenhouse gases.”
A comprehensive list of countries who have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol and are legally bound to its conditions, as of 2006, put together by the UNFCCC.
"The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These amount to an average of five per cent against 1990 levels over the five-year period 2008-2012."

Books

Link

Related Content