human

Extinction by Our Own Hand

5 min

A few billion years from now, the Sun will continue in its life cycle, become an expanding red giant, and most likely envelop the Earth. This spectacular solar smack-down should be no problem for humanity, however. We’ll have already met our demise, most likely via omnicide.

Sound grim? Check out Mary Shelley’s The Last Man, a dystopian novel of war and pandemic chronicling the end of humanity. Or if you are after more recent fare, try P. D. James’ novel The Children of Men, wherein mankind is on the brink of extinction from—drum roll—infertility.

Leaving fiction behind, let us consider Dr. Shanna Swan’s Countdown: How Our Modern World Is Altering Male and Female Reproductive Development, Threatening Sperm Counts, and Imperiling the Future of the Human Race. This book is also dystopian in spades, though in a matter-of-fact scientific fashion which makes a most compelling case about the probability of humanity’s demise.

Some of Dr. Swan’s astonishing findings include: 

  • In the last 40 years, sperm counts in Western countries declined 59 percent
  • The quality of sperm has also significantly declined, carrying higher levels of damaged DNA than previously seen.
  • More than 25 percent of men with erectile dysfunction are under the age of 40.
  • Since 1982, testosterone levels have dropped 1 percent per year.
  • An expectant mother’s smoking while pregnant causes a huge decrease in the sperm count of her son when he reaches adulthood.
  • Following current projections, sperm counts are set to reach zero in 2045.
  • Miscarriages have risen 1 percent each year for the last two decades.

Needless to say, all this is a huge impediment to having children.

If your dystopian fix is still not sated, maybe Swan’s explanations will do the trick. She says it’s chemicals that are killing us – in particular, “endocrine-disrupting chemicals.” The most problematic of these are:

1)    Phthalates, added to plastics to increase flexibility and longevity, which are known to decrease sperm counts and testosterone levels in men. For women, phthalates contribute to ovarian cysts, disrupted menstrual cycles, and early menopause.

2)    Bisphenol A, found in plastic bottles and commercial canning, interferes with conception and causes early miscarriages. Bisphenol A is found in flame retardants, electronics, hard plastics, food packaging, cosmetics, personal care items, and much more.

These poisons leach into the contents of containers, which are then consumed, allowing the chemicals to interfere with the body’s natural hormonal functioning. Those hormones most essential to baby-making, testosterone and estrogen, are interfered with the most. Then we have what Swan calls “collateral damage” from stress, poor diets, and daily exposure to environmental or occupational toxins. Her solution is for people to eliminate those chemicals from their households, and also advocates outlawing these toxic chemicals, a process which is already underway in Europe.

But these chemicals are not the only causes of declining fertility. Back in 2008, the Center for Reproductive Medicine warned that cell phone studies showed that “…radiofrequency electromagnetic waves emitted from cell phones can impair sperm quality” and that “Semen exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic waves emitted from cell phones had higher levels of damaging free radicals, lower sperm motility (the ability of the sperm to move and swim) and sperm viability (the percentage of live sperm), and possibly greater oxidative stress.” The Center also said, "Our findings appear to be in line with other concerns that environmental factors such as toxins, pollutants, and materials used in farming play a role in male infertility.”

As for this high-tech hijacking of fertility, cui bono? Who invents, manufactures and markets these killer chemicals? The answer is, of course, we do. Homo sapiens is choosing technological “progress” even over its own continued existence.

To quote Swan: “The current state of reproductive affairs can’t continue much longer without threatening human survival.”

Countdown has received a smattering of attention from the legacy media, but so far the story has no real legs. The lack of any widespread outrage and alarm at these findings is conclusive proof that the chattering classes are tone deaf to critical civilizational challenges. Moreover, all of us are so addicted to technological gadgets and immediate gratification that we dare not challenge “progress” in any meaningful way.

As Swan says, chemicals are making it biologically more difficult to have children, but this also comes at a time when many in the industrialized world are childless by choice. Reasons vary, but they are often grounded in consumerism. Children would “get in the way” of many couples’ careers and carefree lifestyles. Many insist they cannot afford children, putting the very meaning of family up for debate as a secular social gospel displaces traditional Christianity. Others proclaim that childlessness is the most environmentally conscious course of action, warning of the “carbon footprint” of each human being.

While such priorities may satisfy ideology, individual freedom, personal choice, and career advancement, opting not to reproduce is a Faustian bargain. Doing so endangers the species. From 1964 to 2018 global fertility rates plunged from 5.06 children per woman to just 2.4. While this plunge can be seen worldwide, it is most dire in the West and in East Asia, i.e. the first world. Most advanced societies are aging and becoming less dynamic. Economic stagnation is only an early indicator of the troubles ahead. Just look at Japan.

The modern world is on the path to infertility and extinction. Mankind is on its way out, disappearing by our own hand. We’ll have to leave it to historians of other species to chronicle our omnicide, or at the very least, remember us. Maybe the canines will do so fondly.

--
 

Dear Readers,

Big Tech is suppressing our reach, refusing to let us advertise and squelching our ability to serve up a steady diet of truth and ideas. Help us fight back by becoming a member for just $5 a month and then join the discussion on Parler @CharlemagneInstitute and Gab @CharlemagneInstitute!

Image Credit: 

Pixabay

Louis T. March

Louis T. March

Louis T. March is a businessman, author, and advocate for traditional values. He lives with his family in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia.

Add a Comment

 

Join the conversation...

You are currently using the BETA version of our article comments feature. You may notice some bugs in submission and user experience. Significant improvements are coming soon!

or

texas66
-
Phthalates and Bisphenol A may indeed be contributing to a sperm health problem, but I think we need to address the 800lb gorilla in the room - “dating” and marriage is under attack from every direction - from online dating sites that make it easy to perpetually shop around / present a false picture ‘ behave badly through to Hollywood which glorifies singledom, sleeping around outside the sanctity of marriage, etc. Add on top of this a generation of children growing up in single family homes, many seeing their parent’s drama play out from a front row seat. Or worse, parents who simple don’t know how to (or care to) coach young boys to behave properly or teach young girls to act like a lady. All while watching prime time TV that glorifies anything but healthy relationships. The church and Christian community needs to step in and help mold these young minds and hearts. Older men need to pay attention and when they see younger men stringing a girl along or otherwise not acting appropriately, step in, be a mentor and confidant. Young girls don’t get a pass either. They need to stop being drama queens. And dress appropriately - what do you think is going to happen if we can see your breasts or behind in your short shorts when you lean over. We need a Christian community to wake up and help bring back healthy dating. Most churches solely focus on the trading demographic - young families and elders who financially support it. Singles, aside from anemic singles programs, are almost always fourth fiddle. Invite a single to lunch after church. Invite a single to your holiday gathering. Heck, invite a single to your son’s soccer game or daughter’s ballet recital. We need a church that pays attention to the needs of singles - from how to date in a healthy fashion to help when you have a heart beyond broken.
 
 

or

Brianpeckford@gamail.com
-
I would recommend one read Stev Molloy’s ( junk science fame) before deciding on the validly of what is in this book. Brian Peckford
 
 

or

Pilgrim
-
I see that Louis T. March is not a Christian. His postulations would be greatly informed if he were. The world is becoming increasingly secular, to the point that referring to the scriptures and prophecies that refer to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ evokes howls of derision and mockery. Nonetheless, the Lord himself said he would come again, cleanse the earth of wickedness, and reign for a thousand years in peace. (Matthew chapter 24 for example. It is in the New Testament, one of the four gospels.) Long before man destroys himself, which he seems quite capable of doing, divine events will overcome him. I hear and see many references to God and Christianity in the articles in Intellectual Takeout, but I wonder whether they are mere pretexts for political arguments rather than actual religious beliefs. If Christ is God, his words will all be fulfilled.
 
 

or

Account Photo
Kalikiano
-
I am also 'not a Christian'. In fact, I'm a card-carrying pagan who finds more personal fulfillment in ancient Hawai'ian style traditions than erstwhile 'modern' religious dogma, so bully for Louis March's observations. As a keen fan of both Arthur Schopenhauer and H. L. Mencken, I am also an outspoken critic of humanity, regarding it as little more than another 'failed' effort by Haumea (i.e. Ma Nature) to biologically evolve a higher sentient life form. Human beings are admittedly infuriatingly clever, despite being doomed to extinction by that same cleverness, and it is that very same cleverness that has inflated our self-esteem and self-regard beyond reasonable bounds. Anyone who subscribes to the broader cosmological view of whatever 'realities' we suppose to exist would have to accept the mere fact of our existence with a grain of NaCl. But adulate and glorify our kind? Never! The overall phasic context of human life is comparable, within that greater cosmic regard, to the proverbial mouse fart in a raging typhoon, yet we shamelessly continue to regard our overweening self importance as the only justification for our continued worship of the dual deities of science and technological progress. I have long felt that the best thing that could possibly happen to this poor, beleaguered planet we so shamefully abuse would be for humanity to finally push the Big Red Button and let Haumea go back to the evolutionary drawing board without further ado. PS: As regards the Canines, we all need to reread Clifford D. Simak's wonderful 1952 science fiction fiction novel 'CITY'. Were they to survive our demise, our marvelous canine companions would undoubtedly remember the late, great (but severely flawed) Homo sapiens, and not too unfairly at that...
 
 

or

X