Massive Nurse Shortage Hits Houston After Unvaccinated Fired

6 ¼ min

Jennifer Bridges knew what was coming when her director at Houston Methodist hospital called her up in June to inquire about her vaccination status.

Bridges, a 39-year-old registered nurse, responded "absolutely not" when asked if she was vaccinated or had made an effort to get vaccinated. She was terminated on the spot.

"We all knew we were getting fired," Bridges, 39, told CBS News. "We knew unless we took that shot to come back, we were getting fired today. There was no ifs, ands or buts."

Bridges was one of more than 150 hospital workers fired by Houston Methodist hospital.

"All last year, through the COVID pandemic, we came to work and did our jobs,” said Kara Shepherd, a labor and delivery nurse who joined Bridges and other workers in an unsuccessful lawsuit. “We did what we were asked. This year, we're basically told we're disposable."

Shepherd and her colleagues may be disposable in the eyes of hospital administrators, but they are perhaps not as easily replaced as she or Houston Methodist thought.

Two months after firing unvaccinated hospital staff, Houston Methodist is one of several area hospitals experiencing a severe shortage of medical personnel. Media reports say hospitals have “reached a breaking point” because of a flood of COVID-19 cases.

In an editorial published Tuesday, the Houston Chronicle said the 25-county hospital area that includes Houston had more patients in hospital beds—more than 2,700—than at any point in 2021. News reports make it clear that hospitals are struggling to keep up.

KHOU-11, a local news station, says medical tents have been erected outside of Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital but are vacant because of a shortage of nurses.

“Please send help now," said Dr. George Williams (depicted in main photo), chief ICU medical officer for LBJ Hospital.

While most media reports focus on LBJ Hospital, reports also make it clear other hospitals, including Houston Methodist, are experiencing similar struggles. The Houston Chronicle says Harris Health System (which includes LBJ) is short some 250 nurses, while the University of Texas Medical Branch has requested an additional 100 nurses to help address staff shortages at four hospitals.

Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, a private Houston hospital jointly owned by Baylor College and a local healthcare system, said the hospital “is definitely being impacted” by the nurse shortage.

As for Houston Methodist, the hospital is reportedly struggling as well—although they’ve yet to admit it publicly.

“An internal memo at Houston Methodist Hospital said it ‘is struggling with staffing as the numbers of our COVID-19 patients rise,’” the Chronicle reports.

Public officials are scrambling to address the shortage, which has created a massive patient backlog throughout the Houston area. More than a week ago, Tex Gov. Greg Abbott requested out of state assistance for the statewide crisis, including 2,500 out of state nurses. LBJ Hospital officials said those nurses have not yet arrived.

The metro-wide shortage of nurses reportedly came to light when an ER doctor emailed a state senator about the dire situation in hospitals.

“The combined increase in volume from (COVID and) existing normal volume (and) nursing shortage has made this a terrible disaster at every ER and hospital in the city of Houston,” the physician wrote, according to the Chronicle.

It’s unclear to what extent Houston Methodist’s decision to fire 150 unvaccinated medical workers exacerbated the nursing crisis. For perhaps obvious reasons, hospital officials have been mum on the issue.

What we know is that Houston hospitals that did not abruptly fire 150 employees struggled to deal with the COVID spike, and in some cases people died as a result. So it’s safe to presume that Houston Methodist’s decision to fire 150 employees a few weeks before the Delta variant arrived in force didn’t make the situation any better and probably made it much worse.

Some may be tempted to think Houston Methodist was able to quickly replace the workers they lost, but evidence suggests this is unlikely. Apart from the broader shortage, front line nurses “are burned out,” they say.

“We are all tired of this; nurses are tired of this,” Texas Nurses Association CEO Cindy Zolnierek wrote in a recent public letter.

That Houston Methodist hospital didn’t intend to exacerbate its shortage of hospital staff goes without saying, but it’s also an important reminder about what economists call the Cobra Effect.

Every human decision brings about consequences, intended ones and unintended ones. Unintended consequences are so common economists often call them “Cobra Problems,” after an interesting historical event in India that occurred when the British Empire tried to eradicate cobras by putting out a bounty on them. (Can you guess what happened?)

When hospital administrators set their policy—get vaccinated or lose your job—their goal was to increase vaccination rates of hospital staff. The unintended consequence was a shortage of nurses and other hospital workers during a deadly pandemic.

In June, Houston Methodist's president, Marc Boom, sounded confident that his coercive methods were effective, noting that almost 25,000 of the health system's 26,000 workers were fully vaccinated.

“The science proves that the vaccines are not only safe but necessary if we are going to turn the corner against COVID-19," Boom told employees in a statement.

Other Houston hospitals saw things differently. Two months before Houston Methodist fired its workers, Harris Health System officials announced they would not be requiring hospital workers to get vaccinated, noting none of the vaccines were fully approved by the FDA.

Americans will of course disagree about which CEO’s approach was the correct one. The pandemic, after all, has been bitterly divisive because we’re deeply divided over this very question: should coercive means be employed to achieve certain desired healthcare outcomes, and if so, to what extent?

In 2020, political leaders around the world said yes to this question, and the results were disastrous. A year later, private companies are playing a different version of the same game: take the vaccine, or get fired.

Like the lockdown champions of 2020, corporate leaders no doubt believe their action is moral, proper, and will achieve their desired result. But as the Cobra Effect reminds us, focusing strictly on desired outcomes and ignoring potential unintended outcomes is a good way to get bit.


This article was originally published on Read the original article.

Dear Readers,

Big Tech is suppressing our reach, refusing to let us advertise and squelching our ability to serve up a steady diet of truth and ideas. Help us fight back by becoming a member for just $5 a month and then join the discussion on Parler @CharlemagneInstitute and Gab @CharlemagneInstitute!

Image Credit: 

Flickr-UN Women Asia and the Pacific

Jon Miltimore

Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of His writing/reporting has appeared in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Washington Times.

Add a Comment


Join the conversation...

You are currently using the BETA version of our article comments feature. You may notice some bugs in submission and user experience. Significant improvements are coming soon!


Radiant Angel
I'm sure there would be no problem with these nurses taking the jab if: There were long-term studies showing it to be safe with few negative side effects If they let us know what was in it If proven options for treatment we not being censored If it actually worked Come to think of it, if all these boxes were checked in the positive, a lot of people would be more comfortable with this. If you are "comfortable" as things stand now, chances are you've not been paying attention.


I read somewhere that they are saying the death toll is higher than ever before. Seems like anyone who tests + to Covid is being assigned that, as cause of death, despite their compromising condition or illnesses.
George Leroy
"Medical tents have been erected outside of Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital but are vacant because of a shortage of nurses" Funny how when restaurants are short staffed, they seem to get more crowded as diners have to wait longer to be served. Seems if there really was a new more deadly "variant" out there, those tents would be overflowing with sick patients. At that point this plea would sound more realistic and less like the hand-wringing propaganda we've heard since 2020.


People in healthcare are seeing the "side effects" of the vax. Hence the hesitation. You can bet these hospitals will help schools graduate nurses quicker, with shorter school times, so they can hire them. They know new grads will be desperate for a job and will comply.


It's unfortunate that these workers who clearly misunderstand science and caring for the community were hired in the first place. Nurses who refuse COVID-19 vaccination are better off not interacting with patients given the risk they pose to patients' health.


Pretty callous to dismiss those that sacrificed as much as healthcare workers have during this pandemic. Perhaps they're not swallowing the proclamations of those who have lied to us repeatedly throughout this whole episode as you seem to have. Maybe those learned in medicine understand more about the science than the public at large. The fact that such large numbers of those in healthcare are not taking the vaccine raises questions in my mind about whether we're being told the while story.
What an insulting opinion! These are the same nurses that cared for Covid patients for the last year! During most of that time the news made a Covid diagnosis to be a death sentence! Yet these “ terrible “ people showed up to do their jobs! These are people who believe and understand science, they refuse a vaccine with very little short term and no long term data behind it! Now the data shows fully vaccinated people are catching and spreading Covid! Why risk an ineffective vaccine?
Rowana F
Considering that the FDA itself has let its standards slip a lot as far as whether and how soon it approves a drug as "safe and effective" with an acceptable side effect profile, it's no wonder that many people are not swayed by the FDA giving full approval to one of these vaccines. The facts remain that some side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines have been severe, even deadly, and some may be permanent (neurological damage, miscarriages, diabetes, heart damage, etc.). No long-term data yet.