Politics Are Killing Medicine

3 ½ min

Recently I needed to visit the Urgent Care Center here in Front Royal, Virginia. I have gone there two or three times over the past four years, usually waiting around 15 minutes to see a doctor or a nurse. This time the woman at the front desk told me my wait would be between three and four hours. I left, but when I returned the next day—their system was down, and I couldn’t make an appointment—I was again given the same long wait.

Since then, I have looked at their jobs site and discovered they have dozens of positions open ranging from cooks to nurses. Was that shortage caused in part by the corporation’s demand that all their employees receive the vaccine?

Politicians and policy makers have long demanded that we trust their guidance in these matters of public health, but now it looks like those same demands may be hurtling us toward other public health related problems. President Biden has issued sweeping new orders for vaccine mandates, demanding, for example, that companies employing more than 100 employees force their workers to receive the vaccine. If this mandate is carried out, it will affect hospitals around the country.

For a year, these health care workers stayed at their posts without the possibility of a vaccine. We hailed them as heroes. And now we’re going to fire them when they exercise their right to say no to vaccination?

These mandates for the good of public health now seem to be negatively affecting others, including some expectant mothers. On Sept. 10, a local news outlet reported that the Lewis Country General Hospital in Lowville, New York will no longer deliver babies.           

This measure will take place on Sept. 24 “because too many maternity unit workers have resigned over COVID vaccination mandates.” The chief executive officer of the country’s healthcare system, Gerald Cayer, announced that six members in the unit had resigned rather than take the jab and that another seven were undecided. Of the hospital staff at large, 27 percent have still refused the vaccine. 

This issue is addressed on a broader front by Lauren Weber in a recent Epoch Times article entitled “Vaccine Mandates Affect Hospital Staffing Wars.” She reports on the shrinking pool of qualified health professionals available for work, especially in rural communities. Staff who are already over-worked and worn-out by the many months of battling the virus must now decide whether to take a vaccine they mistrust to keep on working. Some traveling nurses have refused to work in states with mandates. Add to that the hospitals overwhelmed by Delta variant cases and staff needing sick days, and the crisis deepens.

Meanwhile, information about useful therapeutic treatments of the Wuhan virus is either ignored or actively suppressed. Instead of letting doctors and other medical personnel hash out the efficacy of the vaccine or treatments like Ivermectin, politicians and bureaucrats are issuing orders on how to combat the virus.

Physician Justus Hope is one who would likely desire to be a part of that debate. He analyzes the enormous decrease in COVID deaths in India that occurred when that country authorized widespread use of Ivermectin to combat the virus. He compares the Indian state of Uttar Pardesh with the United States, as the two have similar population sizes. “Let us look at the August 5 numbers from Uttar Pradesh with 2/3 of our population,” Hope said. “Uttar Pradesh, using Ivermectin, had a total of 26 new cases and exactly THREE deaths. The US without Ivermectin has precisely 4889 times as many daily cases and 191 times as many deaths as Uttar Pradesh with Ivermectin.”

Does Ivermectin work? Can it prevent deaths and sickness from COVID? I’m no scientist, but data certainly seems to show that it does. At the very least, we should leave that analysis to our health care professionals, with all of them given a voice, instead of politicians and their allies in the media hammering on about the drug being used for horses and censoring those who speak in favor of such therapeutics.

Americans have spent months listening to politicians and policy makers demand that “we follow the science.” Good idea. Let’s return that science to our health care professionals and specialists, let them debate and determine the best way to fight this virus, and get the government out of the way.


Image Credit: 

Direct Media, Public Domain

Jeff Minick

Jeff Minick

Jeff Minick lives in Front Royal, Virginia, and may be found online at He is the author of two novels, Amanda Bell and Dust on Their Wings, and two works of non-fiction, Learning as I Go and Movies Make the Man.

Add a Comment


Join the conversation...

You are currently using the BETA version of our article comments feature. You may notice some bugs in submission and user experience. Significant improvements are coming soon!


Nailed it again Jeff. As usual.


The job list found from the link you inserted is an amazing testimony to something major being quite wrong. As I scrolled down I became more and more incredulous. I've been involved with health care since 1973 on many levels. I would change your title to "Governmental intrusion is killing medicine." Medicare, insurance, Medicaid, reimbursements and the seismic changes these bring about in how healthcare is delivered rarely actually has any benefit to the end product. Patients being cared for. It is sad and all too obvious. Regarding Ivermectin which offers a microscopic view of our current healthcare "Civil War" that is being fought with "Data Broadsides". "Oh yeah! Here take these data you no good ..." as we hurl them back and forth. There are many very smart data experts, statisticians and such involved in this war. As well as smart wannabes. It is being fought in the very public realm of the internet and social media. And no prisoners are taken. "Give no quarter" seems to be the rallying cry! And yet as one looks we must wonder if anyone really understands RCTs. Do they understand surrogate end points and other aspects of these clinical trials? Or do they simply look at the numbers and compare. I looked at the NIH Guidelines on the use of Ivermectin and was impressed by the fact that they looked closely at a number of clinical trials and gave their rationale for how to interpret the results. One has to wonder if they are not correct in their conclusions.... Check out this table from their web site


Living exactly what you are describing. It is obscene to have to submit a religious exemption to a secret panel meeting at undisclosed locations sitting in judgement over whether my faith is sufficient for me to keep my job. I am fortunate. I am able to retire. If fired, I have options. Not so for so many of the young nurses and other hospital employees I work with. Generally, I render unto Caesar what is Caesar's but my body and spirit are the Lord's. In this sense, it is a cause of medical freedom that we are defending but frankly, it's just freedom. After loss of bodily autonomy, everything else is fair game. This is way more than bad taxes without representation, a really bad riot gone bad in Boston or the Coercion Act.